Gardner Ekes Lawyers

1/5 1 Customer Review Leave a review
Become Verified

Gardner Ekes Lawyers has Not Been Verified by ReviewSolicitors

You may want to discover a firm with an established and proven reputation on ReviewSolicitors

Top Rated Law Firms - Highly Recommended and Recently Used By Clients Like You


1 Customer Review

1/5

Overall experience

  • Value for money
  • Professionalism
  • Initial Impression
  • Approachability
  • Services
  • Knowledge

Reviews summary

  • Excellent
    0
  • Very Good
    0
  • Average
    0
  • Poor
    0
  • Awful
    1
Anonymous
Click to rate
Europlex PTY/LTD
Europlex PTY/LTD Added 5 years ago 64 found this helpful Report to admin
September 05, 2019 20190905132437

Commercial -Builder vs Developer Europlex vs Unique living

1

01/2016 Start of development of the site

06/2016 Joint venture between UNIQUE LIVING and EUROPLEX

05/2017 Partnership terminated by UNIQUE LIVING

08/2017 Start of court proceedings by EUROPLEX, followed by cross-claim of UNIQUE LIVING

08/2018 Judgement against Europlex

11/2018 Appeal filed, then listed for 15/05/2019

02/2019 Europlex terminated law firm GARDNER EKES

05/2019 Europlex abandoned appeal based on the advice of new Senior Barrister.


Europlex Pty/Ltd became very unhappy with performed action of my lawyer Hector Ekes,
due to unreasonable demands for payment, after his firm was paid in excess of $230,000.
These funds were paid to Hector since the beginning of the case.
New Lawyers advised me that the sum was unusually high.
Also, funds have been sent to 3 different accounts. That is against the law apparently.
New Lawyers studied the proceedings which we had to get from court because Hector Ekes denied to pass them on new lawyers and demanded
another $100,000 to release documents. This is all documented.
Also, there is numerous dirty SMS from Hector Ekes demanding money.
My new senior barrister advised me after assessment of proceedings and transcripts,
that there are incredible unlogical steps executed by GARDNER EKES and back then barrister DAMIAN ALLEN - from State Chambers.
They said if everything was done properly we had great prospects. Based on the recommendations
we abandoned the appeal because it had no prospect.
Major error/or intentional step by barrister pointed by the new team.

THEY HAVE NOT LODGED MY AFFIDAVITS IN COURT!!! THEREFORE OUR DEFENCE COULD NOT BE HEARD IN COURT.
NOT ONE INVOICED ISSUED FOR $230,000
FUNDS PAID TO 3 DIFFERENT BANK ACCOUNTS
NOT RESPONDING TO OUR NEW LAWYERS DEMANDS
MISLEADING INFORMATION AND LEADING US TO FINANCIAL RUIN!

The cherry on top was a phone call from one of the owners of apartments telling us that SAIF HAYEK, UNIQUE LIVING OWNER told her that
he knew my previous lawyer and we could never win.

My Intentions is to expose this case to the public. It is so much more to express.

We have a strong feeling that our lawyers collaborated with Hayek, even dumbest lawyer would not take those steps in court.

Our business Europlex has been in operation for 16 years with no debts, infringements whatsoever. As well our personal record is superb.

Therefore it is hard to overcome the fact that we have lost money in project etc and as well we have been enormously misled by Lawyers.

There is a proven record of misconduct of Hector Ekes with Law society. It comes to me now that we have been dealing with a colourful lawyer.




Was this review helpful? Yes

Other Sydney Solicitors